We performed a comparison between Qualys VMDR and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Qualys VMDR is praised for its user-friendly interface, prioritization system, and customizable dashboard. It effectively addresses vulnerabilities and offers valuable scanning capabilities. Trend Micro Cloud One users value its extensive range of features, strong vulnerability protection, and real-time server security. Reviewers said Qualys VMDR could improve by offering more customization options and integrating more seamlessly with other systems. The interface could be clearer, and Qualys could enhance scanning capabilities for IoT and industrial control systems. Trend Micro Cloud One should provide equal support for AWS and Azure and enhance its automation capabilities.
Service and Support: Qualys VMDR's customer service is mostly considered accessible and responsive. However, some reviewers reported slow response times and expressed a desire for more skilled support personnel. Trend Micro Cloud One was commended for its exceptional and easily accessible technical support. Users value the expertise and knowledge of the Trend Micro team.
Ease of Deployment: Qualys VMDR's setup is considered uncomplicated and efficient, requiring only a short amount of time. A few users encountered challenges with integration and ensuring data privacy. Some found Trend Micro Cloud One easy to set up, while others found it complicated. It could pose challenges for individuals without a background in IT or information security. The deployment time varied depending on the complexity of the system.
Pricing: The cost of Qualys VMDR varies depending on the organization's business requirements. Some find it affordable, but others consider it costly compared to alternatives. The view of Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is generally positive, though some noted that customers must pay extra for additional services.
ROI: Qualys VMDR is highly efficient in identifying vulnerabilities and reducing risks. Trend Micro Cloud One offers a solid return on investment and smooth integration without any reported issues.
Comparison Results: Qualys VMDR is preferred over Trend Micro Cloud One. Qualys VMDR is lauded for its intuitive and easy-to-use interface, distinguishing it from other similar tools. Users find the setup process of Qualys VMDR straightforward and easy, while reviews of Trend Micro Cloud One's setup process have been mixed. While Trend Micro Cloud One is commended for its comprehensive feature set, users think it needs improvements in pricing, automation, and ease of setup.
"It saves time, makes your environment more secure, and improves compliance. PingSafe helps with audits, ensuring that you are following best practices for cloud security. You don't need to be an expert to use it and improve your security."
"PingSafe offers an intuitive user interface that lets us navigate quickly and easily."
"Cloud Native Security is a tool that has good monitoring features."
"The multi-cloud support is valuable. They are expanding to different clouds. It is not restricted to only AWS. It allows us to have different clouds on one platform."
"PingSafe can integrate all your cloud accounts and resources you create in the AWS account, We have set it up to scan the AWS transfer services, EC2, security groups, and GitHub."
"The UI is very good."
"It is scalable, stable, and can detect any threat on a machine. It uses artificial intelligence and can lock down any virus."
"The UI is responsive and user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the external channel."
"It is quite easy to implement."
"The prioritization feature is great. I think it has all of the advanced features that we need."
"It's really beneficial for scanning and interacting with the agent."
"The reporting is fine."
"There are many features. Its reliability, ease of installation, ease of use, and the richness of the information provided are the most valuable features."
"Technical support is great and we've never really had a problem."
"Qualys VM's most valuable feature is automatic detection."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The stability is quite good."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"Scanning capabilities should be added for the dark web."
"There should be more documentation about the product."
"In some cases, the rules are strictly enforced but do not align with real-world use cases."
"They could generally give us better comprehensive rules."
"I would like PingSafe to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations."
"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."
"When you find a vulnerability and resolve it, the same issue will not occur again. I want PingSafe to block the same vulnerability from appearing again. I want something like a playbook where the steps that we take to resolve an issue are repeated when that issue happens again."
"There's room for improvement in the graphic explorer."
"The tool needs to improve the adding assets and report generation features. I would like to see the policy scan of offline appliances in the product's future releases."
"Sometimes we face a problem with accessing the tool and not getting an expected result. From a technology point of view, they need to look into this."
"It is more expensive vs. other products on the market."
"Make some minimal dashboard improvements."
"Reports were lacking somewhat on the customization side."
"What we have found is that the solution is not closely tied with the patch management. It is okay with newer ones, like Windows 10 machines; it gives the correct patch. But for Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008, it does not give us the correct patch so we have to manually identify the patches. This is a major problem."
"Qualys VM's vulnerability scan could be improved, especially the number of CVE numbers it can manage at a time."
"The reporting needs improvement. It should generate much more stuff like field reports."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security could improve connections with different types of authentication and user groups concerning cloud services."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Qualys VMDR is ranked 11th in Container Security with 77 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 8th in Container Security with 17 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our Qualys VMDR vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
