AWS CodeCommit Reviews

Name: AWS CodeCommit
Brand: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Rating: 4 (3 reviews)

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)

3.7 out of 5

3 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Post review

What is AWS CodeCommit?UNIXBusinessApplication
Price:

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Get the Version Control Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server and more!

AWS CodeCommit is the #5 ranked solution in top Version Control solutions. PeerSpot users give AWS CodeCommit an average rating of 7.4 out of 10. AWS CodeCommit is most commonly compared to Bitbucket: AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket. AWS CodeCommit is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 63% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 15% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

May 2024

Get the category report

Helped 772,649 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Ambresh Lingadhar

Data Engineer at dataeaze system

Jul 31, 2023

There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use.

Read full review

Varish Ansari

AWS Architect at Sustainability Economics

Aug 31, 2023

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap. need some simple way to Cross-account access of Repository and CICD pipeline . I have been using the product for few months. AWS CodeCommit is stable and flexible. The product has good support. We use AWS support, and they give fast responses. The…

Read full review

Shyam Yadav

ascf at Jetking

May 13, 2024

We use the solution for Git purposes and to deploy the EC2 tool It helps us to install our code idea projects. The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper. I have been using AWS CodeCommit for one year. The user interfaces of Bitbucket and GitHub are very friendly. GitHub is an…

Read full review

AWS CodeCommit market share

As of June 2024, the market share of AWS CodeCommit in the Version Control category stands at 9.3%, up from 7.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Key learnings from peers

Last updated May 19, 2024

Valuable Features

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."
"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."
"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

Room for Improvement

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."
"The tool should improve its UI."
"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have.Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has.Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

Pricing

"The solution is expensive."
"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Version Control Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.