We performed a comparison between Appian and MEGA HOPEX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The solution has a lot of strong features for the financial industry, it is very easy to use."
"The technical support is excellent."
"We appreciate the drag and drop functionality and the easy to access plug and play features."
"The agile manner that we require to create our workflows. This is probably the most critical part of our solution and the time it takes to start processing the solution."
"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"Good workflow engines that bridge the gaps of processes."
"What I found most valuable in Appian is that it lets you drill down on multiple things through the structure of the reporting and UI side. It's also low-code, yet it results in quick deliverables."
"What I find the most valuable is the process workflow. It is really good."
"Every module sets up the same information in a unique repository."
"You do not need to be a professional of enterprise modeling to contribute to the enrichment and improvement of the enterprise repository."
"The most valuable feature of MEGA HOPEX is the publication method for static websites. You can generate the whole database into a static website. Additionally, in the new tabular entry, you don't have to put objects or links, you can go and fill a tab and the MEGA HOPEX will generate an object for you in a simple way."
"The most valuable feature is that the software controls everything from a single management window."
"MEGA offers a more integrated GRC platform to facilitate enhanced coordination between the functions of Risk, Compliance, and Internal Audit on a single platform solution - HOPEX."
"The most valuable feature is the completeness of HOPEX's meta-model. It's a strong meta-model that's rigid but comprehensive. It's a logical fit for our understanding of how we want things modeled in our database."
"HOPEX has a panel that offers various views. I think that is very good. MEGA has an app for integrating with a lot of apps. We help our clients integrate HOPEX with a different product like Apple Gateway, for example. I've been with the company for 15 years, and we connect with everything. Our clientele includes almost all of the banks in Mexico."
"Lacks business rules management as part of the solution."
"Lacks integration with other products."
"The performance is pretty good, but the distortions need to be optimized in order for it to work well."
"We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in."
"There is no UI customization possible."
"I would like to see more features for enterprises. They would also benefit from adding documentation and training on their site."
"The ability of the interface to load automatic data is not great."
"Appian could be improved by making it a strict, no-code platform with free-built process packs."
"The initial setup is a little complex."
"The tool usability is weak and it also has a high learning curve."
"Lacking more out of the box integrations."
"Better documentation and training would be helpful."
"There could be continuous AI enhancements for the platform."
"Scalability can be a problem sometimes."
"We have a very close relationship with MEGA representatives in Mexico, and we ask them why they don't offer impact analysis. For example, we have a server in the center and provide the client a view of what's in the peripheral area, like one cluster, application, process area, and services. We want to offer our clients that level of visibility with HOPEX."
"The interface must be improved."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 37 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Interactive with good functionality and helps with productivity". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, OutSystems and Pega BPM, whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Visio and Avolution ABACUS.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.