We performed a comparison between Box and Oracle Content Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."File sharing with collaborators not on the same domain with offline access from multiple devices: I work on many projects that are multi-organizational, such as with customers, suppliers, or acquisitions."
"The collaboration of the solution is good."
"Using Box for cloud storage allows us to focus on the service and maintaining infrastructure."
"We've never had a penetration. We've never had a security issue that their support didn't solve. We love their audit trail. We can know exactly when a collaborator opens. We love how you can define a collaborator."
"Box is very user-friendly; more so than SharePoint."
"It is really easy to load files to and from this solution."
"The ability to collaborate around data anywhere, anytime is the most powerful features of Box."
"Box is very simple and effective, so I prefer Box."
"It's a comprehensive solution for managing documents within our organization's management framework."
"I haven't really come across a case where we're not able to use it for what it is, so I don't really have anything holding us up or any customers holding us up at this point that I know of. There are always some limitations, but as a technologist, I just live with them, and there is always room for improvement, but I don't have anything quantifiable."
"The search features and role permissions are not very user friendly. It only searches the first few pages of a document, which is quite a problem."
"I don't like the low level of role-based security it provides – it's very cumbersome, and the support is ordinary at times."
"I find their API to be quite complex and it could be more straightforward."
"The upload speed needs improvement."
"Working on documents in real-time is sometimes faulty and could be improved."
"The integration with other products should be improved."
"Maturity of the enterprise security around user management."
"Oracle Content Management poses complexities in initial implementation and configuration."
Box is ranked 4th in Enterprise Content Management with 39 reviews while Oracle Content Management is ranked 11th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews. Box is rated 8.4, while Oracle Content Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Box writes "Allows you to upload and download files quickly but lacks integration with Office 365". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Content Management writes "Streamlines document management and enhances collaboration through its robust features and intuitive interface". Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Citrix ShareFile, Office 365 and Egnyte, whereas Oracle Content Management is most compared with Oracle WebCenter, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, Microsoft OneDrive and Alfresco. See our Box vs. Oracle Content Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors and best Document Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
