We performed a comparison between Camunda and Studio Creatio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"The product has a good task management engine."
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."
"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"The flexibility is great."
"The solution is good for data models."
"Studio Creatio is a very good and complete solution. It is very stable, and for customers who need a good response time, in the public cloud, Creatio provides the possibility to have a private server for a high level of transactions and good response time. Their support is great. They are very good, and they know the solution very well. Their response time is also great."
"Creatio also provides us with scalability, performance and agility."
"The most valuable features are performance, built-in variety of multiple task automation, and has international standards notations."
"The pre-configured CRM functionalities regarding the accounts management and contact activities is very good. It's easy to develop workflows."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a low-code and no-code platform."
"The business process management is definitely the most valuable feature. What Creatio ended up doing with their software solution is giving you the power, in your own hands, in a way that is incredibly intuitive and well-structured."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its CRM functionality and the fact that it is a no-code solution"
"It is a low-code platform, that is very intuitive."
"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It's costly and not accessible for small enterprises or startups. It would be great if Camunda offered a tier plan for smaller companies."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."
"Creatio needs to stabilize their marketplace."
"HRM is an area where Studio Creatio lacks and needs to improve."
"The mobile version of the solution could be improved. It's hard to customize it."
"Numerous options can make implementation confusing."
"It appears that at times, our partners might be using Google Translate, resulting in translations lacking context and not being entirely understandable."
"The solution does not allow extensive customization of the UI. I would like to have much more control over the UI when I build a process. Currently on the UI where the fields are placed and the layout is set in place and you cannot change it. Your experience is going to be the same throughout whatever use case that you are building from customer to customer. You can not have much control over how it looks for each customer. This is an area where they can improve on."
"It does not have the ability to run one single large process."
"The way bpm's infrastructure works, you can only have one data source on a page. It has to be connected to the object and you're pretty much locked in at that point... If you want to connect anything other than what exists in that object to that object, you're going to have to create a completely new home for it in that object."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while Studio Creatio is ranked 26th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Studio Creatio is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Studio Creatio writes "Leveraging process automation and advanced tools for streamlined operations". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Studio Creatio is most compared with Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, Mendix, Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems and Oracle Application Express (APEX). See our Camunda vs. Studio Creatio report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
