We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Studio Creatio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."As a business person, I design a lot of screens. The solution really resonates with me. Their design is amazing."
"For our purposes, it is quite scalable."
"In Microsoft PowerApps the most valuable features are the fully customizable design that we can control everything that we would like to control. For example, the integration between Microsoft and third-party services through pre-built connectors, and the functionality to create custom connectors."
"There is value in being able to collect and compare information in real-time to present alternatives for correcting vulnerabilities."
"The cloud aspect has been great. We don't have to do a lot of research in order to begin integrations. It's so easy to integrate with other solutions."
"The solution works great and is stable."
"It allows us to provide all the information in one single place."
"The most valuable feature is that PowerApps can be used by most business users. It is not only for programmers."
"It enables automating tasks and provides self-service options, ultimately improving efficiency and customer satisfaction."
"It is a low-code platform, that is very intuitive."
"Creatio also provides us with scalability, performance and agility."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its CRM functionality and the fact that it is a no-code solution"
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a low-code and no-code platform."
"The low-code tools and business process management that Creatio provides are useful for our internal processes. It is also very easy to use."
"The most valuable features are performance, built-in variety of multiple task automation, and has international standards notations."
"The pre-configured CRM functionalities regarding the accounts management and contact activities is very good. It's easy to develop workflows."
"There are occasional performance challenges."
"The connectors are the main components that reference the data sources, and these need to be improved."
"It would be good if this solution supports standard BPN operations. We are thinking of switching to a BPM solution next year because it is not a BPM solution."
"The solution needs a bit more refinement in general."
"Its user interface can be better. It is good, but it can be a bit clunky."
"Microsoft PowerApps can improve the number of bugs that are present. When you are using the different applications it is not accurate."
"One of the major problems with it is what PowerApps calls the delegation warning. Regardless of what platform, data source, et cetera, that you're using, you can't retrieve more than 2000 records."
"If the price was reduced and the quality of the user interfaces was improved it would be beneficial."
"It does not have the ability to run one single large process."
"Numerous options can make implementation confusing."
"I can have several types of contacts, customers, employees, partners, and so on, and I would like to have a different view for each type of contact in the list view. Currently, there is no way to configure this. This is something I would like Creatio to improve. In this time of COVID, it is very important that all such solutions improve omnichannel communications and omnichannel marketing. Companies need to communicate with customers by using not just the phone number and email but also by using social networks. All companies today need artificial intelligence, machine learning, the internet of things, and social communication."
"Studio Creatio is a new product in the market, making its lack of maturity an area of concern."
"The way bpm's infrastructure works, you can only have one data source on a page. It has to be connected to the object and you're pretty much locked in at that point... If you want to connect anything other than what exists in that object to that object, you're going to have to create a completely new home for it in that object."
"The mobile version of the solution could be improved. It's hard to customize it."
"The solution does not allow extensive customization of the UI. I would like to have much more control over the UI when I build a process. Currently on the UI where the fields are placed and the layout is set in place and you cannot change it. Your experience is going to be the same throughout whatever use case that you are building from customer to customer. You can not have much control over how it looks for each customer. This is an area where they can improve on."
"HRM is an area where Studio Creatio lacks and needs to improve."
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews while Studio Creatio is ranked 23rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 12 reviews. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Studio Creatio is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Studio Creatio writes "Leveraging process automation and advanced tools for streamlined operations". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Studio Creatio is most compared with Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, Mendix, OutSystems, Bizagi and Camunda. See our Microsoft Power Apps vs. Studio Creatio report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.