We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and ITRS Geneos based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Dynatrace and ITRS Geneos were compared and based on user reviews, Dynatrace appears to be better due to its stronger AI capabilities, real user monitoring, session replay, and synthetic monitoring functionalities. Dynatrace also offers better visibility and thorough scanning of services and applications.
"It helps our organization identify potential problems by doing thorough analysis of systems which integrate with one another."
"It gives you a great level of detail into whatever the issue is: Using troubleshooting and getting to the root cause."
"Dynatrace's power lies in its ability to inspect and chart transactions, and draw the PurePath tree. The parameters of the requests and methods can be selected to access the necessary information for efficient analysis."
"Dynatrace covers the important tiers and allows us to quickly find trends and root causes in all our critical application lifecycle steps"
"Stability has been very nice, and Dynatrace runs on the Linux system."
"The stability for the solution is pretty solid overall."
"The benefit for our company is that we have one direction and one main solution."
"This tool helps us gather information from all hosts and services, then cross reference the information."
"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."
"One thing we're utilizing in Geneos is the Gateway-SQL. That's really helpful for us. Using Gateway-SQL, we are able to merge two different views into one. Suppose we have to check something in the log and that we have to check something in the database and do a comparison before publishing a result. We can achieve that using Gateway-SQL."
"One of the most valuable features is that it can be configured by non-developers. It doesn't require development expertise to configure it."
"The solution's log monitoring and alerting mechanisms are very user-friendly and easy to plug and play."
"It enables us to monitor application processes, to do log-monitoring on a 24/7 basis, to do server-level monitoring - all the hardware parameters - as well as monitor connectivity across applications to the interfaces."
"ITRS uses SNMP to communicate with our devices as well as SNMP net probes installed on our servers."
"The flexibility of the product is most valuable. It is highly customizable. If you put your mind to it and think of something you could do, there's a good possibility you can get it integrated within the console, if it's not readily available. The simplicity or ease of customization has been valuable."
"I always appreciate Geneos's stability and ease of use."
"Even with PurePath and the like, it still takes time, a day or whatever - or expert knowledge of some person - to be able to identify a problem quickly."
"Improve Dynatrace for the following industries: telco, eCommerce, and banking."
"Network monitoring is lacking and could be improved."
"Bring the interface to the same level as OneAgent."
"It definitely needs HA, because we have so many applications that are dependent on AppMon that it has been deemed critical. Any downtime, it just affects so many users. So that's one of our key asks for the future."
"The heavy client is not really user-friendly and the concepts (while powerful) are unintuitive."
"We'd like it to be more user-friendly, which, in our case, might be a big ask as we have a fairly complex environment."
"It's not really user friendly. You need to go through a certain type of training."
"The main feature that needs work is the Dashboard designer."
"They have the Webslinger solution where you can see when something is alerting. It's a little bit cumbersome."
"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."
"I would like to see ITRS integrate its setup editor with a SVN to check-in setup XML after major changes."
"The dashboard feature is full of bugs. Grouping items results in a distorted dashboard."
"Geneos' application monitoring could be improved a lot. Products like AppDynamics and Dynatrace provide the process thread-level monitoring, but Geneos lacks these capabilities."
"I would like better access to the data that is being collected."
"ITRS Geneos is not on the cloud at a time when everyone is moving to the cloud."
Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 341 reviews while ITRS Geneos is ranked 11th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 57 reviews. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while ITRS Geneos is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ITRS Geneos writes "The flexible dashboard sets it apart from competing tools, but it's costly and lacks scalability". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and AWS X-Ray, whereas ITRS Geneos is most compared with AppDynamics, Grafana, Prometheus, Datadog and Splunk Enterprise Security. See our Dynatrace vs. ITRS Geneos report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.