We performed a comparison between ForgeRock and Oracle Identity Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Identity Management (IM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Support-wise, working with Omada has been good. We have very good direct interactions and fast responses."
"When we started with identity and access management, we cleaned up and skipped 500 accounts. Therefore, there are a lot of people who are still in our system. Using this tool, we have cleaned up a lot of accounts for ourselves as well as our partners and suppliers. So, we can manage everything now."
"Omada's user interface is elegant and easy to work with. I like Omada's ability to automatically generate accounts for new hires and allow them access to all required systems by established policies. Around 80 percent of workers can start working immediately on their first day without requesting further access."
"It has a very user-friendly interface compared to what we are used to, and it is highly configurable. In the old solution, when we needed to do something, we had to have a programmer sitting next to us, whereas, in Omada Identity, everything is configurable."
"I'm not using Omada, but the interface is easy to use and gives you a solid overview of your identities."
"The thing that I find most valuable is that Omada consists of building blocks, which means that you can configure almost anything you want without using custom code, making it pretty easy to do. It's possible to connect to multiple target systems and to create one role that consists of different permissions in the different target systems. So one role in Omada can make sure that you have an account in three different systems."
"Omada's onboarding features reflect our processes for onboarding new employees well. That is the primary reason we use this solution. We use role-based access control. I'm not sure how much it has improved our security posture, but it's made managing identities more convenient."
"Surveying is a valuable feature because it allows us to import data and see who has access to what data, for example."
"ForgeRock is an extensive product with many functionalities and capabilities, much more than many other tools combined."
"ForgeRock has CIAM, which other products didn't have, and they have DevOps ready."
"Even though we have very small business interests with them today, they see that we plan on growing drastically over the next two years. Therefore, we have excellent support and we are now at a point where we are not calling tech support. We pick up a phone and call the Account Manager and they'll get everything resolved for us. We don't have to queue along with everybody else and go through a long process."
"The most valuable features of ForgeRock are social login and data protection."
"This is a stable solution. When you do experience any issues, you will see it in your DB logs or audit logs so you can easily reach a conclusion of might be causing it."
"We used it to implement multi-factor authentication and to improve our security posture as well as reducing the potential for attacks."
"We create and define the permissions and configurations for the users."
"The solution integrates well and it is important for them to keep up with the current trends in the market quickly enough, and they have been doing a good job at it."
"The support service of Oracle is good. We use it a lot and their response is quick."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Identity Governance is user lifecycle management. Certification is also a valuable feature of the solution. Oracle Identity Governance allows you to assign who has access to what, which is its basic feature."
"I have found the OIM Connector framework, based on ICF, to be the most valuable feature."
"Its most valuable feature is its scalability."
"The proactive controls which can be configured to a granular level allowing the organization the flexibility to meet the changing demands of the workforce."
"The most valuable feature is the flexible automation functionality which has optimized our user access privilege management. This has allowed us to create and delete user accounts more accurately and efficiently. This feature has enabled us to save time and resources needed to perform mundane manual tasks."
"The most valuable feature is the user manager certification that approves or removes user access."
"The most valuable feature is the set of out-of-the-box connectors."
"The security permission inside Omada needs improvement. It's tricky to set up."
"The current reporting tools in Omada are limited, but we expect significant improvements in the new version."
"Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues."
"The UI design needs improvement. One or two years ago, Omada changed its user interface to simplify, but the simplification has not really kicked in."
"What I would most like to see added to the product is role management, especially enterprise or business role management, and the processes around that."
"When making a process, you should be able to use some coding to do some advanced calculations. The calculations you can currently do are too basic. I would also like some additional script features."
"Documentation can be improved. I have already filed a few suggestions to make documentation more clear and more representative of reality."
"It is not possible to customize reports on Omada Identity."
"We're worried about the scaling. We're told it will be okay and there won't be issues, however, I'm not 100% convinced."
"The product's support services in the French language are not free."
"I think the upgrade process is sometimes a little complicated and there are failures that occur."
"As with any complex software platform, there is a learning curve to using ForgeRock, and it may require specialized expertise to implement and manage effectively."
"The user interface could be improved as it is cumbersome and outdated. It doesn't have a responsive UI."
"The identity management model needs a bit of improvement."
"It should have a better user interface. Its flexibility should also be improved. It is not about simplifying; it is more about flexibility. Each company has its own requirements, and ForgeRock can provide more flexibility in terms of the use of existing modules to implement features for the customers."
"The solution's documentation is not very good, and they do not give more details."
"Oracle Identity Governance can capture a lot of loads, it's stable. However, we once had a problem two years ago, but it is now resolved. There are some issues still present, but they're operational. They don't impact the customers. There are some improvements that can be done."
"I have yet to see its full functionality exercised in my organization."
"t is too complex, has too many bugs, and is an immature product, even the best case, beta version."
"The cost of this product needs to be reduced."
"One of the areas that need some improvement with Oracle specifically is the ease of implementation."
"It responds fast but because of the bugs we have already had some major incidents and complete unavailability."
"OIA needs to improve its governance features."
"The solution should be easy to implement with components combined in one file and built-in features to integrate target applications without having to install additional connectors."
ForgeRock is ranked 6th in Identity Management (IM) with 27 reviews while Oracle Identity Governance is ranked 10th in Identity Management (IM) with 66 reviews. ForgeRock is rated 8.0, while Oracle Identity Governance is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Governance and access management solution used for multi-factor authentication that is outdated with an unresponsive UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Identity Governance writes "A scalable solution designed to meet the requirements of medium and large-sized companies". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Ping Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0 and Symantec Siteminder, whereas Oracle Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, One Identity Manager, Saviynt, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. See our ForgeRock vs. Oracle Identity Governance report.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
