We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and Fortinet FortiSandbox based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"This is stable and scalable."
"This solution is very stable."
"It's easy to use, easy to deploy, and I have more visibility over my network that shows which users are connected to the firewalls, which users are connected to the network, and what they're accessing."
"We find the VPN features valuable."
"Secure and easy connect is the most valuable feature. It is a reliable solution, and it works."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"The solution offers great stability."
"The integration capabilities are good."
"When the user gets authenticated, I can assign a different VPN or network to each user."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiSandbox are customization, ICAP protocol, and integration with other vendors. Additionally, the security work very well."
"The solution is very good because it catches a lot of threats in emails."
"he solution's GUI is good."
"The most valuable feature is the protection and the way it works, the technology is what I like the most."
"The solution extracts an attached file before reaching the user and notifies the user if there's something malicious in the attachment received along with an email."
"Integration is one of the solution's most valuable aspects. You can integrate even third-party solutions so that they can send the information or files they quarantine through the FortiSandbox"
"The technical support is very good."
"The most valuable feature was the EDR, endpoint detection and response."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The solution is not stable."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"The reports could be easier to set up."
"I would like for the next release to be more user-friendly for users to do not have as much of a technical background."
"The solution could improve by providing analytics or detailed reports."
"There is lagging in some of the authentication tools to support the newer versions, this is happening because they are not supported."
"One area that could be improved is cost, but you've got to pay for what you get."
"I would like Fortinet to improve FortiClient's compatibility with macOS."
"FortiClient's encryption key could be stronger so that it's not broken too easily."
"The connectivity could be improved."
"For additional features, maybe a form of execution pain files in a non-virtual environment because it has threats that identify when it is being run in a virtual machine."
"For the MSSPs, it would be great if the product could display all the threat chains on a dashboard since it is an area where the tool is currently lacking."
"Fortinet FortiSandbox should improve its performance and security accuracy to keep competitive with other solutions, such as IBM."
"It would be better if it had support for Mac and Linux."
"The integration is limited. The solution needs to offer better integration with multiple vendors."
"The delivery feature in my country is extremely bad."
"The product is good but it could be speedier. In addition, it's quite complex."
"The initial setup of Fortinet FortiSandbox is complex. You cannot only deploy Fortinet FortiSandbox without deploying the stack of Fortinet solutions. The implementation and integration are challenging tasks with the device and placement in the network. We needed to do POC and offloading testing."
Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 14th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 86 reviews while Fortinet FortiSandbox is ranked 5th in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) with 36 reviews. Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiSandbox is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Light and powerful solution design; useful to have". Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Ivanti Connect Secure, whereas Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Trellix Network Detection and Response, Check Point SandBlast Network, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 and VMRay. See our Fortinet FortiClient vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox report.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.