We performed a comparison between Pentera and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"The most valuable feature of Pentera is that you can do continuous vulnerability assessment, which is automated."
"Maybe there are some remediation steps on the website, we can mask sensitive information on the website better."
"What I like the most about Pentera is its solution-oriented approach."
"The product is easy to use."
"The product is easy to use."
"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."
"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."
"The best feature of the solution is the amount of visibility it provides of the vulnerabilities."
"The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options."
"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."
"The solution can integrate with third parties and meets standard compliance."
"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."
"Maybe scalability. I know that the Pentera right now is high level in order to scan big deals over 500 IPs and not less, and not less. That can be more granular. This will be useful."
"The vulnerability scanner, exploit achievements, and remediation actions are all great."
"There is room for improvement in virtualization compatibility."
"The price could be improved."
"Pentera's general dashboards could be improved and made more specific in terms of vulnerabilities that I'm discovering."
"I'd like to see them improve their support."
"The only drawback of the solution is that it is expensive."
"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."
"The one drawback that we have found is the reports."
"They need to have more dependable and faster support."
"Another area of improvement is customer service and support. Tenable needs to include support in the pricing/license. Currently, they push clients to get support from partners or channel distributors, who often charge a lot."
"The solution must provide penetration testing."
"More flexibility is required compared to other solutions."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Pentera is ranked 12th in Vulnerability Management with 5 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Pentera is rated 8.2, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Pentera writes "A stable solution that can be used to do continuous and automated vulnerability assessments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Pentera is most compared with Cymulate, Tenable Nessus, Picus Security, Horizon3.ai and Qualys VMDR, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management. See our Pentera vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.