We performed a comparison between PractiTest and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools."The most valuable feature is the way the libraries are structured so that they were not folder driven."
"The most valuable features are the flexibility, ease of use for writing new test cases, the test plans, and the composition."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the UI. The structure of test cases is easy to understand."
"I use the solution for test management."
"From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for."
"I was on the lookout for automation testing on the browser and I believe this tool is very interesting in that matter. The solution is useful for UI testing. You just need to add the URL that is to be checked."
"I use the product to create test cases and share them with my team and manager."
"The product helps us create test cases and reports."
"The solution is very stable. We've never had any issues with it."
"It doesn't allow you to connect to multiple different tracking tools."
"TestRail's user interface is not great. When you use it for the first time, you will be very uncomfortable and not know how to create test cases. It doesn't have a field for preconditions and post-conditions."
"The reports should be more user-friendly."
"I've encountered at some point, some difficulties on the administration side, but I don't remember exactly what they were."
"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."
"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language."
"It would be nice to have a description section when creating the test scenario itself so I can indicate what the configuration should be."
"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."
"Their customer support could be improved. Sometimes we struggle with that. It could be faster. Whenever we raise any query, they get back to you but the turnaround time is very slow."
Earn 20 points
PractiTest is ranked 14th in Test Management Tools while TestRail is ranked 2nd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. PractiTest is rated 8.8, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of PractiTest writes "Offers one click graphical dashboard reports and advanced customization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". PractiTest is most compared with Jira, Zephyr Enterprise and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, TFS, Tricentis qTest, Tricentis Tosca and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.