We performed a comparison between AWS Auto Scaling and Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It helps us to reduce the cost."
"It can scale."
"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."
"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."
"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."
"It is a stable platform."
"The product provides self-healing features."
"The tool gives you the flexibility to scale up and grow. The solution is also fast to deploy."
"One of the excellent features is the service analyzer, which is truly impressive."
"The observability is great and valuable."
"The KPS used to automate the integration policy is the most valuable feature of Splunk ITSI."
"The flexibility to develop and consolidate many solutions into one platform is great."
"Alerts and episodes are valuable to me."
"The most valuable features are the agility, being able to ingest many data sources with no limitation on capacity."
"We liked the built-in calculation of health scores."
"The glass tables are very helpful."
"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."
"The speed of the solution must be improved."
"The setup can be a bit complex in some situations."
"AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better."
"The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved."
"In comparison to other public clouds, the product is costly."
"The solution's infrastructure scalability and elasticity could be improved."
"The product could add more features for managing instances."
"Splunk ITSI lacks out-of-the-box solutions for enterprise users."
"The license cost is expensive."
"After upgrading Splunk ITSI from version 4.11 to 4.13, the analyzer stopped finding values for KPS and services."
"If the product had some prebuilt machine learning features, it would add value to our use cases."
"Splunk ITSI generates numerous false positives and has the potential for enhancement."
"We have problems doing upgrades and operating alternate new versions."
"The dashboard queries should be improved. More queries should be suggested in order to produce better dashboards."
"Some of our customers occasionally require the development of the connectors when there are no native connectors so that we can develop in Python or for customer slash comments as well. If they could adjust that, it would be ideal."
More Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 15th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews while Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is ranked 12th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 28 reviews. AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) writes "Provides great end-to-end visibility into our network environment and helped us reduce alert noise". AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with , whereas Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is most compared with ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Grafana, Dynatrace, Splunk APM and BMC TrueSight Operations Management. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
