We compared BMC TrueSight Operations Management and SolarWinds NPM across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: BMC TrueSight Operations Management earned high marks for its comprehensive analysis, simulated monitoring capability, and detailed reporting. SolarWinds NPM is commended for its adaptability and extensive network surveillance functionalities. SolarWinds NPM is commended for its adaptability and extensive network surveillance functionalities.
Room for Improvement: TrueSight users say the solution could allow the user to drill down more and improve interoperability. SolarWinds NPM needs improvement in edge computing capabilities and data reporting. Users also said the performance could be better and that they would like to see expanded IPAM functionality.
Service and Support: Some customers praised BMC support as quick and efficient, but others experienced delayed responses and said some engineers lacked product knowledge. While some customers described SolarWinds support as helpful and responsive, others reported delayed responses.
Ease of Deployment: BMC TrueSight Operations Management's setup can be more challenging and time-consuming than some solutions. Some users said SolarWinds NPM was straightforward to set up, while others perceived it as complex.
Pricing: BMC TrueSight Operations Management is geared toward enterprise customers, so it’s more costly than some, but the price is negotiated on a case-by-case basis. The cost of SolarWinds NPM varies depending on the customer’s size and requirements. Some users find it costly.
ROI: Users said TrueSight’s ROI is difficult to quantify and uncertain. Some users reported immediate benefits from using SolarWinds NPM in terms of security and business outcomes, while others have not.
Comparison Results: BMC TrueSight Operations Management is a premium enterprise solution suitable for large enterprises. It features comprehensive monitoring capabilities and excellent reporting. However, TrueSight’s steep price tag may put it out of reach for many small businesses, the setup is complicated, and the solution’s support has received mixed reviews. SolarWinds NPM is a customizable solution that’s easy to deploy and features comprehensive network monitoring capabilities. However, some users consider it costly and voiced concerns about technical support and user experience.
"The Event Management is outstanding; still is the most interesting part of the product."
"The major advantage of the product is estate management."
"The ability of this platform to monitor the very diverse assets that we maintain around the world is its most valuable feature... We support a vast array of manufacturers' equipment, like HP, IBM, Cisco, Dell, EMC, Hitachi... We can do it all with [this] one [solution]."
"I like the deep-dive detail and end-user metrics data. The synthetic monitor is the best one. The best point of the new one is that there's no need for configuration. You can inject the Java script and start to change major developments in the application. This is a good approach, and we received all the data using this."
"The noise reduction for ticketing works much better than we have seen in a lot of other companies."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It is very helpful to be able to apply rule-based routing to alerts."
"I like the event management part."
"One of the best features is the reports feature."
"All the features are very good. The monitoring of the equipment, the configuration manager, and the IP address monitoring are great."
"The stability is fantastic."
"We found that it was easy to operate, and it was simple if anyone has entry-level working experience or even if someone is not experienced."
"The interface is user-friendly, making it easy to use."
"The most valuable features of SolarWinds NPM are network performance monitoring and the overall benefit for servers."
"The most valuable feature is the way it monitors the environment, and how user-friendly the console is for the end-user. The interface is also very easy and it captures all the information very well."
"This solution offers a very good view of our network and allows us to effectively monitor performance."
"More modules for less popular applications and better documentation."
"BMC's solutions for cloud monitoring (monitoring of AWS and Azure resources) are very poor in stability and customization."
"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."
"The UI for the end users could be improved and more flexible than it is now."
"I would like to see a little more out-of-the-box event correlation and expanded AIOps type capabilities. Where you can train your artificial intelligence operations to be able to memorize an issue once you encounter one scenario, so if you encounter that same problem, you can get to the root cause very quickly."
"The stability of BMC TrueSight Operations Management needs improvement. My organization's infrastructure is vast and implemented based on BMC recommendations, but the solution needs to be optimized for large-capacity infrastructure."
"The graphs are extremely limited. We don't have a lot of dashboard options. To make reports and dashboards more useful, we usually need to integrate some dashboard solutions."
"The product must provide application or service monitoring features."
"We'd like to see a bit more automation in the future."
"Being able to detect devices that are trying to connect wirelessly would make using this solution much easier."
"The price of the solution can be improved."
"The only thing that can be improved is to continually add to the existing capabilities of the product."
"The reporting is good, but I want it to be a little easier when creating custom reports. The reports are all on the website now, but it takes some know how to get some to display the way you would like."
"The solution is not always good with new features, so it's take a long time."
"The root cause analysis and installation faults are not clear."
"Application Performance Monitoring should be included in this solution."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 21st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 49 reviews while SolarWinds NPM is ranked 4th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 147 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while SolarWinds NPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds NPM writes "High-level, comprehensive, and proactive monitoring in a user-friendly interface". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and New Relic, whereas SolarWinds NPM is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, ManageEngine OpManager, ThousandEyes and Entuity. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. SolarWinds NPM report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.