We performed a comparison between Celonis and QPR ProcessAnalyzer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Process Mining."The process mapping is most valuable to us."
"For the amount of information that it processes, it works relatively fast. I like the visual presentation and the interface is intuitive. I also like that Celonis has a learning academy."
"Celonis is one of the best solutions on the market. It offers you a lot of training materials and exposure to its ecosystem. Celonis is trying its best to prepare an ecosystem for it because, without an ecosystem, you will not be able to scale up."
"Celonis has helped me to identify and prioritize process improvement areas. Because we understand the end-to-end lead time, including waiting times and areas where rework happens, we can see the performance bottlenecks."
"The real-time replication was just implemented and is quite useful."
"The process chart is valuable in identifying the bottlenecks."
"The solution has very detailed documentation for technical items so it is very easy for developers to use."
"Celonis' best feature is a new one called Action Flow, an enhanced version of earlier automation features with lots of integration options with other systems so you can access third-party systems and automate some actions there too."
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"The solution can be a bit expensive."
"The pricing policy is not affordable in Ukraine."
"With Celonis, the way to use the product is one of the main difficulties users face in our company."
"The price is high for us."
"The support costs are very high."
"With every upgrade, the product is completely changed."
"The way they manage the data should also be improved. There is a lot of room for improvement there because a lot of duplicated data gets created, which should be improved. There should be ease of data management and code management."
"Lacks a couple of algorithms that can better identify bottlenecks and provide a better view of them."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
Earn 20 points
Celonis is ranked 1st in Process Mining with 44 reviews while QPR ProcessAnalyzer is ranked 15th in Process Mining. Celonis is rated 8.4, while QPR ProcessAnalyzer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Celonis writes "Great process mining, process discovery, and opportunity identification". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QPR ProcessAnalyzer writes "Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple". Celonis is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, UiPath Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, Software AG ARIS Process Mining and IBM Process Mining, whereas QPR ProcessAnalyzer is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Intelligence.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.