We performed a comparison between Cisco Meeting Server and Webex based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The UI is user-friendly and very good overall."
"What I like most about Cisco Meeting Server is its quick management. The solution also has a straightforward configuration."
"You can use the Cisco Meeting Server to set up conference calls and virtual meetings. Those are the two primary functions of Meeting Server. Most people in the company are using Microsoft Teams, so we only use Meeting Server when we have an internal meeting for all staff."
"The share screen option available during conferences is one of the best features of Cisco Meeting Server."
"Cisco Meeting Server is an easy and less complex solution."
"Screen share is the most valuable feature."
"Webex has frequent updates and it is very good."
"What we like about Webex is that it is a hosted solution, so there is no demand for us to invest in hardware, skill, or manpower to maintain our cloud meeting capability."
"Webex is a thin client and we like the interface. It is easy to use."
"What I value most about Webex is its stability compared to other solutions."
"The implmentation of Webex is simple. It does not a lot of time."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"We use Webex for virtual meetings."
"What would make Cisco Meeting Server better is integrating it with Zoom and Teams so that you can connect or make a call through any of the two third-party solutions."
"This is a difficult solution to install and it should be made easier."
"A few features are missing on the Meetings app, like a recording function. My understanding is that you need to buy a separate recording solution. It's modular, so you have to enable some functions if you want to use them. For example, we had to enable the Mood function. Recording is the primary feature we'd like to see in the app."
"Cisco Meeting Server should include a feature to control another user's screen during a remote session."
"In Cisco Meeting Server, GUI is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product's price could be better."
"The solution should come as a big client for the system. It should be able to be used just like chat software when necessary, similar to instant messaging."
"Sometimes we've had issues with the connection."
"The licensing could be a bit simpler."
"There is a small bug when it comes to connecting my Webex with my Outlook Calendar. Some meetings show up, and others don't. They should fix this bug."
"There could be more some AI-related features."
"The interface of Webex should be improved and it is difficult to find information."
"Webex could add some integration with Microsoft Office or G-Suite."
Cisco Meeting Server is ranked 8th in Virtual Meetings with 5 reviews while Webex is ranked 2nd in Virtual Meetings with 121 reviews. Cisco Meeting Server is rated 8.4, while Webex is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Meeting Server writes "A scalable tool useful to hold conferences and video meetings". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webex writes "Used to conduct online third-party client meetings or third-party vendor meetings". Cisco Meeting Server is most compared with Pexip, Zoom, Skype for Business, Cisco TelePresence and Polycom RealPresence Clariti, whereas Webex is most compared with Skype for Business, TeamViewer, Zoom, Cisco TelePresence and Huawei Video Conferencing Platform. See our Cisco Meeting Server vs. Webex report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
