We performed a comparison between Drupal and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."You can build websites on it very quickly."
"The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."
"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."
"It is good for big projects."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"It is quite good."
"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"It is a little bit simplified."
"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."
"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."
"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"The vertical application could be improved."
"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."
"We mostly use the Life Sciences package. That package is somewhat dated. There should be enhancements to the Life Science package and additional offerings to support pharma in particular."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
Earn 20 points
Drupal is ranked 5th in Web Content Management while OpenText Documentum is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Drupal is rated 8.6, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Drupal is most compared with SharePoint, WordPress, Liferay Digital Experience Platform, Adobe Experience Manager and Plone, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and OpenText eDOCS.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
