We performed a comparison between ERPNext and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the product's initial setup a nine on a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."
"The most valuable feature is the detail in all of the processes. The solution captures our policies and enables us to implement our policies in SAP. There are different models that address our needs."
"We're able to get all our processes flowing together. We're able to make all of our business processes talk to each other."
"From a technology standpoint, the theory and analytics are fascinating."
"The solution's most valuable features are performance and processes."
"I have found SAP S4HANA to be scalable."
"The scalability is excellent, especially on cloud deployment models."
"I can verify and provide the overall financial aid report and also the management report."
"S/4HANA falls under a single terminal. We can easily access the data, and the performance is good."
"The look, feel, and color are areas in ERPNext that can be improved."
"There are some problems with the support provided for the solution, so it is not quite easy. It takes some time for them to offer us support."
"The procure-to-pay solution in the Contract Management angle could be better. If you look at it on Ariba, the Contract Management Life Cycle for Ariba is more robust. You can create documentation, SLAs, and NDAs. Apart from the procurement aspect of the contract, you have the legal side, but Ariba cannot do that. From what I've seen, the features of the procure-to-pay model in S/4HANA and their Contract Life Cycle Management side primarily focus on the procurement side. I believe it would be good if this solution could handle a part of the legal side. They will incorporate Extended Warehouse Management and Transportation Management into the S/4HANA cloud. Most big companies that use a solution like S/4HANA have a legal department within the organization. Suppose they can incorporate that to be in S/4HANA suites; I think it'll be good. It will be just like what we have with Transportation Management and Extended Warehouse Management. The user interface could be better. They have too much information on the interface, and our customers still keep complaining that it looks complex. Even though many things have changed, they still complain that the interface or the screen they see is a bit complex. It's only when they see the Fiori interface that their mind becomes a bit calm."
"SAP S4HANA could improve by having a more seamless easier integration, faster integration. The overall implementation timelines should be reduced."
"During parallel preparation of go-live processes, SAP B1 and S4H transactional data alignment can be difficult to track."
"When we want to raise a ticket on the SAP portal, the process takes a longer time, and there are many selections that confuse the user."
"In an upcoming release, it would be beneficial to have more practical intelligence in the system, such as protective maintenance, or artificial intelligence."
"We would like to see more DevOps capabilities in the future."
"The Capex and Opex could be improved."
ERPNext is ranked 31st in ERP with 1 review while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 67 reviews. ERPNext is rated 0.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ERPNext writes "An affordable tool that offers many useful and better modules than its competitors, along with great stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". ERPNext is most compared with SAP Business One, Tactive Construction Management Software, SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Microsoft Dynamics AX, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.