We performed a comparison between Mobius Content Services Platform and OpenText Extended ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously."
"The tool's most valuable features are document storage, security, and compliance."
"WebReports has a lot of capabilities that offer good opportunities to customize the applications the way we want to."
"We use Core Share to share documents with external auditors or with vendors, and that prevents them from being able to get into the whole system. It is useful."
"OpenText Extended ECM's most valuable features include permissions and security models. I also like the tool's ability to add metadata and use it to categorize information."
"It's a very good solution."
"The solution's automatic document numbering, state management, and process flow are very useful features to go through the full cycle of the document."
"The integration of a document management platform with many other applications, e.g. SAP, SuccessFactors, Salesforce, SharePoint, etc."
"Being able to tag metadata on documents and being able to have different workspaces in there for our documents is valuable. We do loan documents, and different types of documents have different types of retentions. We are able to categorize based on that, and we are able to do tag searching to find what we are looking for."
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment."
"Sales and service need to be more consistent."
"We are looking for new, advanced UI features. Currently, the UI does not look great."
"The initial setup can get really complicated, and it takes time."
"OpenText Extended ECM's user interface could be improved."
"Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important."
"When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product."
"User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client)."
"The tool's documentation is not proper and has missing information like steps."
"There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better."
More Mobius Content Services Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mobius Content Services Platform is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 3 reviews while OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews. Mobius Content Services Platform is rated 7.4, while OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Mobius Content Services Platform writes "Time from creation to access is much better, as reports are immediately available upon generation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". Mobius Content Services Platform is most compared with IBM ECM, IBM FileNet, SharePoint and Alfresco, whereas OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco. See our Mobius Content Services Platform vs. OpenText Extended ECM report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
