We performed a comparison between New Relic and ServiceNow Cloud Observability based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are the dashboards and tracing."
"Every time there is a crisis, high traffic, or if we see a problem with a server, we go to New Relic and monitor it to determine the cause."
"It is a one stop shop and integrated with PagerDuty seamlessly. The solution is pretty self-contained."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to receive in-depth information about applications. It can detect a lot of important information."
"The solution is good for sending alerts, drawing graphs about system usage, and creating plug-ins."
"The integration and configuration of New Relic is straightforward and easy."
"The most valuable feature is the New Relic APM module to deep-dive into the application, to get bottlenecks to the surface, and to improve application performance. Also, the New Relic Insights module creates a real-time dashboard on application performance to create awareness for the DevOps team."
"We use it for monitoring, identifying when services go down, or when they are outside of what we would consider normal operations."
"The ability to create a stream based on different parameters, operation name, service name, URL, tags, and URI part, is one valuable feature."
"The solution Lightstep/ServiceNow has a couple of pretty advanced functionalities to help us investigate a deviation and help the development teams have better observability in the environment using distributed and complex services."
"The UI is very intuitive."
"The customization of the start and end time is kind of cool."
"Some AIOps are missing in New Relic APS, and I would like to see more features in this area."
"How granular I could go down at looking at certain data, especially related to the operations, is limited."
"It would help customers if there were an on-premises version available."
"I haven't come across any features that are lacking."
"I would like to see the company implement the AI auto-baseline feature which Dynatrace has."
"The solution must provide better support for Azure Web Apps service."
"We would like to receive more AWS-specific details from the New Relic Dashboard, like EC2 health."
"The support team could be better. Because of the different versions of different tactics of integrating reactive code base, the documentation is not very clear if someone has to be onboard. I would rate the documentation of Lightstep a five out of ten. It could need improvement."
"The design of this solution is not very intuitive and probably could come with more friendly tips for beginners."
"The dashboard and graphics must be improved."
New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews while ServiceNow Cloud Observability is ranked 48th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 3 reviews. New Relic is rated 8.6, while ServiceNow Cloud Observability is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Cloud Observability writes "Provides effective observability and offers robust alerting and monitoring capabilities". New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus, whereas ServiceNow Cloud Observability is most compared with Grafana, Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability and Splunk Enterprise Security. See our New Relic vs. ServiceNow Cloud Observability report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
