We performed a comparison between Oracle Taleo and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Benefits Administration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is easy to use. Requisition management and pre-screening are the two most valuable features."
"The solution offers good benefits for administrators."
"The Talent Acquisition and Headhunting features are good."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"Good integration capabilities and extensibility."
"Performance and goal management are good to have, based on certain client requirements where the user base isn't too large, but the most workable domain of Taleo is the recruiting module."
"The integration between the different models like personnel administration, work management, payroll, and time management are the most valuable and key features."
"It is a pretty stable solution."
"It has the best data management features."
"Payroll processing is my favorite HCM feature, and I like all the SuccessFactors talent modules also. SAP is making good progress on enhancements to the features in the SF modules."
"SAP HCM has a good performance."
"SAP HCM has valuable features for analytics data management."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"They have some interesting features in the learning space."
"Lacks some systems that we need."
"The bulk recruitment feature does not work well."
"It would be ideal if we could integrate the solution with Olympia. It would be helpful if we could add another support desk for an IT person. It would be great if the product was more interdisciplinary and could include IT."
"The pricing could be improved."
"I don't see very valuable features in this product because it has an old way of interpreting ATS. It should be more flexible in managing datasets and data searches. The screening data is a long process in Taleo."
"There are always going to be little caveats here and there that you might not have known about as far as changes are concerned, however, it's not business-oriented to the point where the business shuts down."
"In terms of Oracle Taleo as a product, there are a lot of things which can be developed; most feedback which I have heard from customers is about the dashboard and the home page, both of which are quite basic."
"SAP HCM's long and tedious transactions can be improved."
"Reports need to be added on the time management side."
"System usability is a challenge."
"The solution is rather expensive."
"There are already success factors for the cloud solution which cannot be integrated into S/4 HANA."
"It was difficult to deploy. There were challenges regarding configurations and implementation. So, we had a lot of issues."
"It would be very helpful for our company if a new version was released with the ability to contain all of the things that we have newly introduced in our company."
"The extensibility of the integration could be improved."
Oracle Taleo is ranked 10th in Benefits Administration with 14 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 4th in Benefits Administration with 46 reviews. Oracle Taleo is rated 7.8, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Taleo writes "Recruiting module is highly usable, with good performance and goal management features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Efficiently handles the entire hire-to-retire cycle management within an organization and the ability to scale is outstanding". Oracle Taleo is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday and Eightfold Talent Intelligence Platform, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and PeopleSoft. See our Oracle Taleo vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Benefits Administration vendors and best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Benefits Administration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.