We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Benefits Administration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of PeopleSoft is the functionality that allows the ability to find all the data about employees that are needed."
"Flexibility in configuration."
"The solution is easy to scale, expand and make bigger."
"Its user interface is impressive."
"The breadcrumb approach to navigation in PeopleSoft is good. nVision is also a good supplement."
"The most valuable feature is IDE."
"The new version of this solution is very scalable."
"PeopleSoft has been fairly reliable for us. We haven't had any issues with stability."
"The most valuable feature is Organizational Management (OM)."
"HCM is a very important module that each organization should want to use. It will help any organization to calculate and control the cost of their human resources."
"We have features such as ABKRS based on the client's requirement, tariff and TMSTA, and so on."
"The valuable features of SAP HCM include managing employee data from hiring to retirement."
"It simplifies everything for human capital management, and all users can do self-enrollment for leaves and those kinds of things. The employee self-service feature is quite a powerful feature for me. You can install it on your mobile phone or iPad and do your employee service activity there."
"Technical support is excellent."
"The most valuable feature is the Personnel Administration."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"Global payroll could be easier to use."
"The area that could be improved is the upgrade process, it's not the easiest. Oracle stopped supporting our version. So we have to move either to the cloud or work in a non-supported situation. That was certainly a disadvantage. That's also the reason why we decided not to stay with Oracle. Now we are moving to SAP."
"This solution could be improved by lowering the cost of support."
"Stability is an area where the solution lacks and needs to be improved."
"Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved."
"The solution needs to work on its mobile technology. We're hoping in the next version we're working on implementing, 9.2, will have more of this."
"The learning and development side of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"One of the areas that could improve is the capability of utilizing mobile for some of the self-service activities that are missing. They are running on the older platform. What is happening is people are focusing on the cloud. PeopleSoft is a good provider and should into the cloud. That could be an advantage for them. Customers would not have to go find another solution that is a completely different platform that has different functionality altogether."
"It was difficult to deploy. There were challenges regarding configurations and implementation. So, we had a lot of issues."
"This solution needs to be more configurable and user-friendly."
"The current platform is quite rigid and not as flexible and end-user friendly as other HR solutions."
"A better user interface and greater AI integration are crucial."
"Managing changes in applications can be challenging since it complicates testing and unit testing, resulting in longer testing phases. This time-consuming process often leaves little room for actual work."
"The product's license is very expensive."
"SAP HCM could improve by having more resources and making it more user-friendly. It is complex."
"It is a bit tedious and manual to work with."
PeopleSoft is ranked 3rd in Benefits Administration with 80 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 4th in Benefits Administration with 47 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Efficiently handles the entire hire-to-retire cycle management within an organization and the ability to scale is outstanding". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and PeopleStrong , whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and UKG. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Benefits Administration vendors and best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Benefits Administration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.