We performed a comparison between ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, BMC and others in Process Automation."This solution has a robust cloud model, which it supports, and the pricing is also very competitive in terms of pay-per-use. Right now, it seems like ACI is winning a bit in terms of its pricing model."
"We have automated processes with IBM BPM and DocuSign. Its valuable features include low-code, timer, etc. It makes it simple to implement the products. We generate reports using the solution."
"Its workflow and integration with SAP are the most valuable features. It is also a stable solution."
"We can scale by increasing the infrastructure which is currently running."
"It is transparent to business users because it is mostly picture based modelling."
"IBM BPM is a stable solution."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of IBM BPM."
"With the tester coach wherein you can interact with the interface while you're designing the process."
"This solution is very stable."
"The initial setup of medium complexity. So, there is room for improvement to make it better."
"We had a weird problem that whenever the database would go down, even for a few seconds, it broke the connection. It would not come back up as it was supposed to. However, working with IBM, we were able to figure out a fix, then it came back up, even after an interruption of the database."
"The engine itself tends to accumulate a lot of data that needs to be cleaned up, and that's the kind of thing that keeps it from, in some scenarios, scaling as much as it needs to. And then, when you're building solutions, if you're not careful to keep the screens from being associated with too much data, if you're going to just do things the way that a lot of people would just assume that they can do, without having experience of having made those mistakes before, it will accumulate a lot of data, and that will cause it to perform very badly."
"It's a bit technical, related to the instance of migrations. It's a tough thing to handle, in every new release, in every upgrade, that we have to do things in the applications or in the product. I think IBM is working on it but I know there are a lot of requests coming in from different organizations on this."
"Needs better reporting. I do not think that we are fully taking advantage of what it already has yet."
"We have been experiencing bad performance and instability."
"It is not user-friendly."
"They don't have a mechanism to achieve processes, data sources, and data."
"Also, we would like to see integration with artificial intelligence, machine learning-type of technical capabilities. Right now, there are a lot Watson libraries out there. Building those integrations more, out-of-the-box, from IBM would be a good direction."
More ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is ranked 26th in Process Automation with 1 review while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Process Automation with 105 reviews. ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is rated 8.0, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub writes "Robust cloud model support and offers competitive pricing with a pay-per-use model". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is most compared with , whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.