We performed a comparison between AutomationEdge and UiPath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup was easy and straightforward."
"The support from the vendor is very good."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the technical support of the solution a nine out of ten."
"The studio design is fine compared to other similar products. There is nothing extraordinary about it, but at the same time, there are not any negatives."
"It helps us with cost optimization and easy implementation."
"The product's most valuable feature is the executor."
"The most valuable feature of AutomationEdge is creating accounts."
"The chatbot that they have is most valuable. It is one of the best features because they own it, and they don't need to integrate with other parties to have a chatbot. This is one of the main features. The rest of the features are common to all RPA tools or vendors available in the market."
"Quality of life improvements such as the multiple assign activity and more recently, the ability to change arguments to variables and vice versa are very appreciated."
"The most valuable features are the ease of use and the amount of resources and community that are out there for UiPath. They have all of the information that you would generally pay for with other providers. It's a very easy-to-learn solution as long as you put time and effort into it."
"UiPath's interface element identification is arguably more reliable than Automation Anywhere's."
"RPA is a valuable feature for interacting with GUI interfaces."
"The Excel activities are valuable. We can do browser automation through other sites or tools, but for Excel, using tools or options like Selenium or JavaScript is quite complicated because we have to import the file from the JSQL or other things, whereas, in UiPath, we get direct activities. We can directly perform the operations by using the activities. We can directly apply logic to it, and that is how UiPath makes Excel automation easy. This is why I like it."
"The most valuable thing about this solution is that it is easy to develop and easy to train everyone how to use."
"The Orchestrator management tools are growing a lot and are constantly improving."
"I like the fact that UiPath makes everything fast, and you don't need to employ as many people to do all the dirty work. All of our clients only used UiPath."
"They could provide more technologies for IT and security to enhance machine learning capabilities."
"It's not an intuitive tool."
"The installation process could improve. It was difficult to complete."
"In the future, they should have a similar version for the cloud and on-premises, and the installation should be flawless within few minutes."
"The price of the solution could be improved."
"The ease of use is the main thing on which they really have to focus. If they want to go against the giants, it should be improved in ease of use, and it should be more user-friendly. It would be helpful because everyone should be empowered irrespective of whether they know how to code or not. They should enhance its user interface and make it more intuitive."
"With the solution, customizing software can be time-consuming."
"With other automation solutions in the market, we can simulate the process in our notebooks where the solution creates the code for us, but with AutomationEdge we can't do this."
"Active Roles works with policies and access templates, as well as workflows, which are really powerful. While it comes with a lot of example policies and access templates, there are zero built-in workflows."
"UiPath can improve its AS center region by expanding its reach and addressing technical difficulties in certain areas."
"Tech support takes time replying to queries. It should be improved."
"I would like to see them dive into more industry-specific use cases."
"We use intelligent automation for things like document processing. There is a validation center where the ML model extracts some values, and we can validate if it's correct. That aspect could be improved a little. The percentage of values extracted without validation could be increased. It's currently an attended process, but they should give you the option of making it unattended."
"Initial deployment is very complex and some integrators aren't well qualified."
"One area that could be improved is how we access the UiPath Academy courses."
"Capturing ROI needs improvement. I would also like for it to have more logging mechanisms in Orchestrator."
AutomationEdge is ranked 16th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 11 reviews while UiPath is ranked 1st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 763 reviews. AutomationEdge is rated 7.8, while UiPath is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of AutomationEdge writes "An RPA tool to automate functions, tasks, and processes that also allows users to do coding from the scratch". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath writes "Facilitates end-to-end automation, has good AI and document understanding capabilities, and saves us costs previously spent on manual tasks". AutomationEdge is most compared with Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism and EdgeVerve AssistEdge RPA, whereas UiPath is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and Robocorp. See our AutomationEdge vs. UiPath report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
