We performed a comparison between Commvault Cloud and Iron Mountain Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support is great."
"Commvault has support for backing up operating systems and servers."
"We now have the capability to recover a virtual machine without relying on the NFS system, but instead are able to use certain features provided by Commvault."
"Quick backups and restores of data are the most valuable features. It is important that it is an easy solution to integrate with the SAML authentication of our tenant, so we can have our users log into the systems and do their own restores, if needed."
"The solution’s user interface for managing the on-prem environment is good."
"The data protection itself is very good compared to other products."
"The most valuable feature of Metallic is its flexibility and user-friendly."
"It's great for getting data back."
"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"When you deploy Complete Data Protection for past services, it's more complicated because you cannot directly back up from the previous service host. We have to build a proxy server, like a middleware, to directly access the past database server. It's complex and hard for beginners to figure out."
"Reduce the complexity for better understanding of the reports. There are a lot of variables in which you can get confused while elaborating on reports."
"The new HTML5-based management portals are very nice, but do not yet have all of the features of the Java-based client."
"There could be improvements to the backup failures."
"Sometimes, we have a performance issue with the backup speed. So, that has to be rectified and improved."
"Improved documentation and user training resources could contribute to a smoother onboarding process and more effective utilization of the platform's capabilities."
"The main area for improvement is that we sometimes experience negative effects from their updates. If they had a larger test area for their updates, that would help."
"The initial setup was complicated."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
Commvault Cloud is ranked 3rd in Backup and Recovery with 104 reviews while Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews. Commvault Cloud is rated 8.6, while Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Commvault Cloud writes "Provides excellent visibility and helps reduce costs and time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". Commvault Cloud is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Azure Backup and AWS Backup, whereas Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication. See our Commvault Cloud vs. Iron Mountain Connect report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.