We performed a comparison between Inflectra Rapise and UiPath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."
"It's pretty straightforward to set up."
"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the training that is available."
"The pricing is fairly decent."
"I have worked with other automation tools and UI Explorer is the standout feature of UiPath. For web-based applications, we can interact with every HTML element, from head to tail. UI Explorer is a valuable addition to UiPath for creating complex, web-based automation."
"The APIs are very effective in building workflows."
"UiPath is a strong brand."
"The tool's most valuable feature is Task Capture."
"This solution is intuitive, user-friendly, and has a specific framework that allows for quick robot deployment."
"The queue feature is the most interesting to me because it allows us to work on a list of tasks in parallel on several robots."
"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."
"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."
"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."
"UiPath fails jobs sometimes and doesn't give you direct instructions on why it failed. A little more insight into failed jobs would be beneficial. It should have more documentation and short training modules."
"UiPath should also add activities for the Excel application like formatting Excel columns and rows."
"I would like to see the replacement of VB.NET with some more popular programming language as the program's backbone."
"At the functional level, UiPath is almost perfect. The only area for improvement would be the ability to use code. In Blue Prism and other tools, we can write the code, whereas UiPath is drag-and-drop, so sometimes we have limitations when it comes to implementation."
"We need them to improve the scalability, as we are still building up. The product is not big enough yet to eliminate human errors."
"Sometimes in their partner communication, they aren't consistent. This maybe is related to the fact they are growing as a company."
"I want a dashboard on pending and ongoing automation in Orchestrator. Currently, we have to check folder by folder to see them."
"I would like to have cloud in the next release. It's one of those things that allows customers to be able to have an easier access point."
Inflectra Rapise is ranked 30th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 7 reviews while UiPath is ranked 1st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 763 reviews. Inflectra Rapise is rated 7.2, while UiPath is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Inflectra Rapise writes "The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath writes "Facilitates end-to-end automation, has good AI and document understanding capabilities, and saves us costs previously spent on manual tasks". Inflectra Rapise is most compared with Katalon Studio, whereas UiPath is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Robocorp and Pega Robotic Process Automation. See our Inflectra Rapise vs. UiPath report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
