We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and Software AG ARIS Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The support team responds fast."
"The interface is simplified and easy to use."
"I have found Software AG ARIS Process Mining scalable."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...On a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the setup a nine."
"It is very easy to work on the way the ETL happens in ARIS Process Mining."
"One feature I found really cool was the Conformance Engine."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"There should be a single site for modeling and mining."
"Customizing KPIs and building dashboards were not as intuitive as other similar tools."
"The installation is straightforward, we didn't have any technical issues with installing. However, we needed support to complete the implementation."
"When the process models are transferred back to the design environment for further optimization and simulations, we need to see some improvements in the way the models get created in the design."
"I guess we have many unnecessary steps within our processes. There is room for automation and room for enhancement within our application portfolio management...In short, I would like to eliminate unnecessary steps in some processes in this solution."
More Software AG ARIS Process Mining Pricing and Cost Advice →
KiSSFLOW is ranked 6th in Business Performance Management with 12 reviews while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is ranked 14th in Business Performance Management with 6 reviews. KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6, while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Software AG ARIS Process Mining writes "A stable cloud-based solution that allows optimization in addition to process discovery and analysis". KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Camunda, Nintex Process Platform and Appian, whereas Software AG ARIS Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence and UiPath Process Mining. See our KiSSFLOW vs. Software AG ARIS Process Mining report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.