We performed a comparison between Imanami GroupID and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Provisioning Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I have found the overall features to be useful."
"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."
"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."
"One of the most valuable aspects of SailPoint is its open integration interface."
"The solution is one of the main security products you need to control access and have visibility into what's happening in your organization. It helps with managing access to applications, ensuring governance, and obtaining certifications."
"IdentityIQ's best features are the hassle-free user experience and security."
"User provisioning and the role management features are good."
"It significantly reduces the workload for certification processes."
"It is simple and easy to implement."
"The solution is very good at the management of the identity lifecycle."
"This solution is great for providing control access across your environment."
"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."
"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."
"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."
"The UI needs to be more user friendly. More concentration on historical policy violations would be great. In terms of new features, I would like to see artificial intelligence and machine language added."
"The cost can be prohibitive for middle-tier companies."
"SailPoint IdentityIQ needs to improve its customization. It should also incorporate some standardized tools for implementation."
"They can work on their strategy for the on-premise version. They have to decide whether and for how long they will support the on-premise version. The new features first appear in the cloud, and after that, they are released for the on-premise version. In the cloud, you have more options and flexibility, which is absolutely normal. They have to have a clear strategy regarding whether they'll support the on-premises version with the same focus. The licensing for on-premise and cloud is a little bit different. They can make it the same."
"One needs to understand that SailPoint is into full-fledged IAM practice with a long-term vision, and customers will get a quick ROI with best practices implementation."
"The connectors are far too manual. This needs to be automated a bit."
"The interface should be simple and easier to use."
"What it doesn't do is provide notice in the event of a vulnerability or offense from the security."
Imanami GroupID is ranked 10th in User Provisioning Software with 3 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 61 reviews. Imanami GroupID is rated 8.4, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Imanami GroupID writes "Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". Imanami GroupID is most compared with Netwrix Auditor and ManageEngine ADManager Plus, whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock and Microsoft Identity Manager. See our Imanami GroupID vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ report.
See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors and best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.