We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and Unqork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The most valuable features of Pega BPM are low code, no code, functionality, and easy development."
"The most important features of Pega BPM are case management and claims management, and soon they'll also be offering claims processing. I also love Pega BPM in terms of performance. It's also one of the very few user-friendly solutions in the market. It may take some time to learn Pega BPM, but once you get a proper handle on it, tracking and managing processes become very easy anytime, anywhere. Pega BPM also has very good documentation you can use to learn the solution. Pega has a community portal that has complete information and explanations, and if you're facing a challenge, you can post your challenge on the community portal and get a resolution at the same time."
"The ability to define processes, build reports, and get insights or analytics on data is most valuable. It is a powerful platform."
"The product helps you to build faster."
"It is quite configurable, which is the most exciting feature. We can easily configure it as per our needs."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors."
"The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there."
"From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services."
"To learn Pega, you need to be a partner. If someone just wants to learn Pega for the sake of learning, they won't be able to do so as they don't give access to that."
"The unit testing needs to improve, as well as the user interface."
"First-time customers will find its licensing tricky. The technical support team for this solution could be faster in resolving tickets."
"Pega BPM's documentation should be improved, especially for freshers or new trainees."
"The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon."
Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 57 reviews while Unqork is ranked 24th in Rapid Application Development Software with 1 review. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while Unqork is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Fastens application development and has all the features to meet the requirements of our customers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Unqork writes "Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA, whereas Unqork is most compared with Appian, Microsoft Power Apps, Salesforce Platform, OutSystems and ServiceNow Now Platform.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.