We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is operating well overall."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"The workflow designing and integration are the most valuable features. Also, the UI design was pretty easy."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The case management is great."
"When our clients automate the KYC and onboarding processes, they can reduce their manual force and then deploy them in much better tasks rather than the mundane activities of selecting forms and gathering information."
"A product with good API and EDI components."
"The stability is good."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is its reliability. It has a lot of great documentation from the service providers. Additionally, it is easy to use."
"One valuable feature is that it is event-driven, so when new data is available on the source it can be quickly processed and displayed. Integration is definitely another useful feature, and B2B is one area where webMethods has its own unique thing going, whereby we can do monitoring of transactions, monitoring of client onboarding, and so on."
"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."
"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."
"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."
"The tool supports gRPC."
"The cost of licensing could be improved."
"This is a quite expensive product."
"It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work."
"The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through an upgrade process. I think that's an area where they can make it a little smoother."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
"Lack of stronger cloud support is somewhat inconvenient for users and implementation."
"There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
"One area that needs improvement is the version upgrade process. Many customers I've worked with encounter challenges when transitioning from their current version, such as x or 9, to a newer version. The process is not smooth, and they must shift their entire website."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
"Large file handling is pretty hard comparatively to other middleware tools."
"The learning curve is a little steep at first."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and Microsoft Power Apps, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi iPaaS. See our Pega BPM vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.