We performed a comparison between eG Enterprise and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Enormous capability to monitor Citrix environments."
"The most important feature is the ability to design, then implement monitoring tests on the fly as we are adapting to different situations."
"It gives good insight into inside of what's going on with Exchange."
"Single pane of glass to review status of the full environment."
"User session details"
"What I like about eG Enterprise is that it's easy to use. It's a simple product. You can get up to seventy-five to eighty percent of the required information based on real user experience and diagnostics."
"Its ability to monitor failures and to restart a Windows service when it fails."
"The product is simple to use."
"Compatibility with Prometheus databases and the Spring Boot application make it the first choice when moving toward an SRE model."
"The best feature was the creation of graphs and trends."
"The best thing about Grafana is the visualization. The colors and the ease of use make it very user-friendly."
"The integration between Loki and Tempo is valuable."
"It is easy to change and move virtual servers."
"We can write queries in different languages, which is beneficial for visualization."
"We like the alert features."
"Almost any kind of visualization is possible with Grafana and all dashboards are configurable."
"Their dashboards could use some improvement. The ability to customize them a bit more."
"The interface could be improved as it is not real intuitive. It is not user-friendly."
"The solution should improve on the security side and include some more API integrations into wider application platforms."
"Dashboards are difficult to create, and not so useful."
"I can understand why they designed the user interface (UI) the way they did, but sometimes in the management of the eG Manager, it can be a bit clunky."
"would like to see improvements in the alarm display console."
"Application TCP latency is an area with room for improvement, but I believe this is already on the roadmap."
"Back-end configuration is not easy to implement."
"There is a need for improvement in automating daily monitoring reports, especially when alerts are triggered due to system downtimes or fluctuations."
"Its UI features to create charts can also be improved. Some features could have a link to the documentation."
"Setting up alerts via Grafana is a bit complicated, and alerting needs to improve."
"The solution should include online support."
"We need different kinds of applications in our infrastructure to see information in Grafana."
"Writing queries can be a bit difficult because the syntax must be maintained."
"There are not a lot of plugins for financial market monitoring."
"Grafana doesn't provide anything for reporting."
eG Enterprise is ranked 40th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 20 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews. eG Enterprise is rated 8.2, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of eG Enterprise writes "Great visibility, easy to set up, and has very responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". eG Enterprise is most compared with ControlUp, Zabbix, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and PRTG Network Monitor, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry and Dynatrace. See our Grafana vs. eG Enterprise report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.