We compared Tanium and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Overall, Tanium is praised for its comprehensive visibility into endpoints, security measures, efficient endpoint management, and powerful analytics capabilities. Users appreciate the top-notch customer service but mention high pricing, complex licensing, and system performance improvements needed. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint stands out for its threat protection, real-time monitoring, and user-friendly interface. Customers also commend customer service and competitive pricing, with positive ROI noted. Areas for enhancement include faster response times and improved documentation for both products.
Features: Tanium's valuable features include comprehensive visibility, effective security measures, efficient endpoint management, and powerful analytics capabilities. On the other hand, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers comprehensive threat protection, real-time monitoring and detection, efficient system management and reporting, user-friendly interface, seamless integration with other Microsoft products, and effective incident response capabilities.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Tanium is higher compared to other similar products in the market, requiring additional resources and time. On the other hand, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has a more positive experience, with a straightforward setup process that doesn't require much effort., Based on user feedback, Tanium has shown positive ROI with improved efficiency, cost savings, enhanced security, and centralized IT management, while Microsoft Defender for Endpoint excels in threat protection, ease of use, and real-time insights.
Room for Improvement: There is room for improvement in both Tanium and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Tanium users have requested better system performance, improved documentation and training resources, and more customization options. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users have provided feedback on areas that could be enhanced.
Deployment and customer support: Based on user reviews, there is variation in the duration required to establish a new tech solution for both Tanium and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Some users of Tanium reported spending 3 months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while others needed a week for both. As for Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, some users mentioned the same timeframes for deployment and setup., Users highly praise the customer service of Tanium, citing helpful and responsive assistance from knowledgeable and professional support staff. Customers commend Tanium for their efficient and effective customer service. On the other hand, customers express satisfaction with the customer service of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, appreciating the support team's ability to address concerns and provide effective solutions. The quality of customer service provided by Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is highly regarded.
The summary above is based on 96 interviews we conducted recently with Tanium and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"This solution definitely increases our security posture. When you are reviewing your existing fleet or endpoints and based on the configuration that you put out of your Defender for Endpoint, you then receive a security score from Microsoft. Depending on what rules you have configured, what policies you have deployed, and what attack surface reduction rules that you have set up and deployed, it is almost gamifying information security in the sense that you are always trying to achieve a higher score. The more hardening you perform on your endpoints, the better score you receive. This generally tends to give you a better peace of mind, but also makes you secure at the same time."
"We can run the virus scan across our entire environment."
"I like the fact that it has the ransomware solution in there. I'm glad that the ransomware solution is built into it. That's probably the biggest thing that I see in Microsoft Defender."
"Defender is stable, I haven't had any problems with viruses when using it, and it's easy to update."
"We had Norton Antivirus before, and with Norton, we didn't have a way to centrally manage a lot of features. Defender allowed us to deploy it from our Office 365 admin console. That is probably the biggest thing that made us go with Defender."
"Defender is integrated into the operating system. It's integrated with everything. You don't have to spend time analyzing what you have to do to be sure that the integration is okay between the security tool and all the other apps. This, from my point of view, is the main advantage."
"We had certain compliance and usage issues. For example, our company wanted to go with CIS, but we didn't have a proper way of measuring whether the endpoints have the right standards in place or whether they were compliant with CIS. Microsoft Defender was like a one-stop for most things because it gave us the vulnerability and patching scores so that our vulnerability management teams can focus on covering up the vulnerabilities and the patching team can check the vulnerable versions and deploy the right versions."
"It is already integrated with Windows 10, so you don't need to worry about that."
"I like the tool's incident response and security patching."
"Tanium's most valuable feature is its instant discovery aspect."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the consolidation of all historical data on device endpoints, security drivers, firmware, and Software version gaps."
"The solution is scalable and helps to understand how infrastructure works. It helps to improve the health of the organization."
"The product is granular and can build complex roles compared to other EDR vendors."
"I'm not so familiar with the tool but I like the interaction of the console to the picture. Patching is the primary model I have been focusing on for the last couple of weeks. So I have created a proof of concept environment and have been checking the available features."
"Tanium’s linear-chain architecture is valuable."
"The security features are very valuable."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The support needs improvement."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"Detections could be improved."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint does not offer default templates for alerts, requiring us to configure everything ourselves to avoid numerous false positives."
"Phishing and Malware detection could be better."
"In terms of improvement, they update the platform it seems quite a bit. Every month something is in a new spot or something changed somewhere. There should be less of that."
"Reporting could be improved. I would like to see how many security incidents occurred in the last six months, how many devices were highly exposed to security risks, and how many devices were actually compromised."
"There is room to improve the security of the solution."
"I would like to see fewer pop messages and alerts."
"Sometimes, there are different skews. In a basic skew, they should have basic log analysis without the need to integrate with any third-party or SIEM solutions, like Sentinel. This would make it so much easier for users who don't have log collection or log analysis."
"The solution can be more user-friendly."
"The solution can give a lot of false positives."
"The solution needs to improve the reporting and tracking capabilities."
"I would like to have more integrations and custom plugins to input. Integration is always a big deal in a lot of different environments."
"We had some issues with the solution's OS upgrade."
"Most of the time, agent-relative issues have to be more equipped with self-healing features. At times, the agent is there, but for some reason, it doesn't report a status. It gives certain problems that are obviously agent-based."
"Any movement into a SaaS solution has challenges since the processes and data flows are not well defined. Hence, you need to build it at the same time."
"They could improve the UI."
"It is not really additional functions, or the features that are needed, rather the complexity would be reduced based on the number of modules required to put together a comprehensive operational security and risk compliance model."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is ranked 1st in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 182 reviews while Tanium is ranked 36th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 15 reviews. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is rated 8.0, while Tanium is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint writes "Eliminates the need to look at multiple dashboards by automatically providing one XDR dashboard to show the security score of each subscription". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tanium writes "Useful tool for vulnerability management and deploying applications, needing improvement in its OS upgrade". Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Security, Intercept X Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and CrowdStrike Falcon, whereas Tanium is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Qualys VMDR, ServiceNow Discovery and Tenable Security Center. See our Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. Tanium report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
