We compared Qualys VMDR and Tanium based on our users reviews in six parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
The setup process for Qualys VMDR is generally smooth and efficient, requiring minimal effort and encountering few problems. On the other hand, Tanium's setup is more dependent on the size and complexity of the network, resulting in differing experiences for users. While some find it simple, others encounter difficulties. Additionally, Tanium's deployment involves multiple team members and can be time-consuming, taking several months to finish.
Qualys VMDR is notable for its effective prioritization system, ongoing monitoring, adaptable dashboard, and extensive vulnerability overview. In contrast, Tanium shines in its exceptional threat hunting, patch management, software inventory, and incident response capabilities.
The cost of setting up Qualys VMDR can vary depending on the desired features, with some users finding it reasonably priced or competitive. However, there are extra charges for specific features such as patch management and EDR policy compliance. Qualys VMDR has proven to be effective in minimizing cybersecurity risks and resolving vulnerabilities, resulting in a positive return on investment. In contrast, Tanium has an annual license fee and is considered expensive compared to its competitors. Despite the higher cost, users believe that Tanium provides value for money and is a strong solution.
Service and Support
The feedback on customer service and support for Qualys VMDR is varied. Some customers have praised the technical support, mentioning the availability of a global team and positive interactions. However, there are also customers who have had negative experiences and highlighted the lack of skilled support personnel. In contrast, Tanium offers a direct relationship with customers and provides an educated technical account manager. Nevertheless, some customers have mentioned that support could be enhanced, specifically in terms of reducing response delay times for issues. In summary, both products have received mixed feedback regarding their customer service and support.
Comparison Results
Based on user feedback, Qualys VMDR and Tanium were compared. Users found Qualys VMDR to be highly effective in identifying vulnerabilities and providing comprehensive reports. It was praised for its user-friendly interface and ease of use. Users also appreciated the platform's ability to automate remediation processes and its integration with other security tools. On the other hand, Tanium received positive reviews for its scalability and ability to manage large networks efficiently. Users highlighted its real-time visibility and quick response time. However, some users mentioned that Tanium's interface could be complex and required a learning curve. Overall, based on user reviews, Qualys VMDR and Tanium both offer valuable features, but Qualys VMDR seems to have an edge in terms of user-friendliness and comprehensive vulnerability management.
"The most valuable features are vulnerability scanning, policy compliance scanning, and tablet for web application scanning."
"This is one of the best products I have worked with so far. I like the power of Qualys, and it's a better solution because you can scan a compact file, a BIT file, or batch files. The product already knows what's happening inside, and you don't need to expand the package. Tenable will do the same thing, but you need to have a package issuance claim. With Qualys, we can immediately understand the file, even a compact file. If there's some kind of discovery or incident, you will know what happened in the environment."
"I am impressed with the VMDR feature."
"Provides great functionality."
"The most valuable features of Qualys VM are its ability to do proper vulnerability assessment. It has a lot of updates for all the vulnerability databases from all over the globe. It's an amazing solution when it comes to the versatility of the features it has. Additionally, the reports are very good. It generates very detailed reports about the vulnerabilities inside the environment"
"Qualys VM's most valuable feature is automatic detection."
"There are many features. Its reliability, ease of installation, ease of use, and the richness of the information provided are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to run different capabilities with the same agent. With only one agent, we can have EDR, vulnerability management, compliance and some basic SaaS security capabilities."
"Tanium's most valuable features are patch management, inventory, and distribution software."
"For incident response tasks, all these tasks can get done in minutes with minimal disruption to the end-user."
"I'm not so familiar with the tool but I like the interaction of the console to the picture. Patching is the primary model I have been focusing on for the last couple of weeks. So I have created a proof of concept environment and have been checking the available features."
"The product is granular and can build complex roles compared to other EDR vendors."
"The security features are very valuable."
"I would say Tanium is the best tool for vulnerability management."
"The interrogation piece was the most valuable feature because it was very detailed."
"Tanium's most valuable feature is its instant discovery aspect."
"The price could be better. Asset view is still a legacy feature. I'm not able to extract the information about the asset with complete details. It would be better if they fixed that in the next release. I know Qualys is already working on it, so I'm hopeful it will be available in the next five or six months. That would be something that's changed where I seek improvement."
"Qualys Container Security can improve the interface. It could be easier to navigate and be enriched."
"They should make it accessible for more operating systems."
"The ability to manage user accounts and give rights to the operator to know about abnormalities of applications is something that needs improvement."
"Sometimes the scanning can get overwhelmed and start to drag when a lot of users are trying to scan at once."
"If anything, I would like to see the user interface modernized a bit more."
"Could use additional security for the app."
"When you want to cover yourself for scalability, you will be charged for the number you place on the scan itself."
"The most painful thing is the interface. It's a bit unclear sometimes."
"Tanium’s scalability could be improved."
"The solution can give a lot of false positives."
"They could improve the UI."
"The solution lacks mobility."
"The reporting could be improved."
"I would like to have more integrations and custom plugins to input. Integration is always a big deal in a lot of different environments."
"Most of the time, agent-relative issues have to be more equipped with self-healing features. At times, the agent is there, but for some reason, it doesn't report a status. It gives certain problems that are obviously agent-based."
Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews while Tanium is ranked 36th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 15 reviews. Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2, while Tanium is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tanium writes "Useful tool for vulnerability management and deploying applications, needing improvement in its OS upgrade". Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Wiz, whereas Tanium is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Configuration Manager, ServiceNow Discovery and Tenable Security Center. See our Qualys VMDR vs. Tanium report.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
