We performed a comparison between HaloITSM and ServiceNow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's initial setup process was quite straightforward... I rate the technical support a nine and a half out of ten."
"The product’s UI is very good."
"The most valuable aspect is that is is codeless."
"Good stable and scalable solution."
"Straightforward tool."
"I have found that sorting and grouping functions are particularly useful."
"It is user-friendly and simple to use."
"You can scale the solution."
"Will give us better control over asset management and technical debt once we can centralize all contract information."
"The most valuable feature is that this is a Cloud solution."
"We can keep track of incidences. There is a bucket where we keep all our information, and it enables communication between stakeholders. It helps us collaborate with each other."
"The solution's integration part needs to improve...In the future release of the solution, I expect to see certain changes in the programming of the solution. A customer of the solution should be able to customize it as per their need."
"The product does not have its own orchestration engine."
"There are no improvements needed. There is very little that HALO has not already built that is not on its roadmap."
"Some enhancements to the self-service platform would be helpful. That part is still a little barebone... Also, the mobile app is not bad, but it's limited."
"The RPA needs improvement. That's a new area for them that they're just entering into now."
"When it comes to changing some of the features, I would like a little more leeway."
"There is inherent complexity with this tool because of the number of things that it can do."
"The challenge with ServiceNow lies in its expansive portfolio of services. It can be complex, and users may find it expensive and challenging to understand. There is a need for a configurator within ServiceNow that guides users on how to utilize the tool effectively. This configurator should provide insights into licensing, team requirements, and the best licensing model based on whether companies prefer ownership or consumption-based models."
"I have enjoyed all the features. There is not any feature that I have missed or didn't have."
"The solution’s user interface could be improved and given a better design."
"The reporting, which also includes dashboards, needs to be improved, and there should also be the ability to turn on and off portions of Project Management. Currently, as soon as you install the new version, you've got to go back there and make all the tweaks. There should be just a configuration file that goes to the new version. The Project Management module does not leverage the knowledge base the way it should, and there is no built-in ability to get to the articles. Resource management should be easier. It would be amazing if they can make resource management a little bit more graphical. There are other solutions that I've seen where resource management was a more visual experience."
HaloITSM is ranked 14th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 3 reviews while ServiceNow is ranked 1st in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 212 reviews. HaloITSM is rated 9.0, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of HaloITSM writes "An affordable and scalable solution that provides an excellent UI and many out-of-the-box integration capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "A stable and scalable solution that has excellent features and is useful for collecting data and building KPIs". HaloITSM is most compared with JIRA Service Management and Freshservice, whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM, IBM Maximo and Appian. See our HaloITSM vs. ServiceNow report.
See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.