We performed a comparison between Jamf Pro and Kandji based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about JAMF, Microsoft, Kandji and others in Mobile Device Management (MDM)."The most valuable feature for us is the security, including risk analysis and patch management."
"Intune's feature that I have found most valuable is its auto-pilot feature."
"Among the most valuable features are the Company Portal that is built into Intune, and the update rings so that we can manage what types of future updates the devices get."
"The solution is scalable. We currently have tens of thousands of users within our organization using the solution."
"It is very easy to use. It has a very easy interface."
"We have one MDM that works with Windows, iOS, and Android."
"The most valuable feature of Intune is the central dashboard for compliance and policy management."
"The Autopilot feature is fantastic. It is a Microsoft product, so it deals best with Microsoft operating systems, but it can integrate with iOS, Mac OS, Linux, and Android."
"There is also zero-day support to all new Apple OS."
"The DEP enrollment is quite good. We're planning to migrate to the Jamf cloud this month."
"As an administrator, I really love the integration with Apple Business Manager."
"The ease of use and access allows us to manage all of our devices collaboratively."
"It's a scalable product."
"The self-service portal to share scripts and other tasks that have extremely minimized the need for calls to our support teams, or even sharing the applications we package and allowing users to pick and choose what apps they need or want, instead of just blanket installing everything from our old environment."
"I have been using Jamf Pro for a few years now, and I'm impressed with its functionality and ease of use."
"Jamf Pro has allowed us to make sure settings for our devices are easily installed so our end-users don't need to worry about a significant amount of steps for setup. We also use this to send applications to devices."
"It's a very easy plug-and-play solution where you can just enroll the devices and choose the features you want."
"There can be delays in the deployment of new policies."
"Could benefit from user having more control over devices."
"The solution could improve its flexibility."
"The main disadvantage seen today is regarding Linux clients. We have a lot of development resources that have Linux on their clients, and we can't manage them on the same platform, as we do with other clients such as macOS and Windows. So, it should have support for Linux clients. It should also have better support for macOS."
"I wanted to check if there is any provision at the Intune level to restrict certain things, such as a website, but unfortunately, that feature is available only in Microsoft Defender. Intune has web filtering capabilities, but they are only useful for protection from malicious websites, whereas we would like to be able to restrict a website. For example, YouTube is a clean website. No one would identify it as a malicious website, but if we want to stop the end-users from going to that website, we have to go for another product, such as Microsoft Defender or another third-party proxy solution. It would be great if this capability is included in Intune."
"We would like to see support for Chrome and/or devices for Chromebooks."
"It should be simplified. I've worked with many different mobile device management solutions, and Intune is one of the more complex ones. It could be more simplified, and some of it is related to the wording that is being used, such as a configuration profile versus a policy. They really should have had different names to make it less confusing."
"The configuration and pricing can be improved."
"Some improvement can be made in the customer service realm, while also making additional training level courses available for online study and exam-taking."
"Apple does block certain actions from happening or disallows Jamf from making certain changes."
"I think that there should also be more integrations with Jamf that could better the intelligence-gathering when making business decisions."
"There is still no feature for properly patching T2 Security Chip-enabled Macs."
"It would be great if we get an email notification when the Mac users install any apps, so IT can be alerted."
"The integrated patch feature is good but needs some tweaking."
"It would be nice if there was a built-in means of renaming computers that worked reliably."
"Simple things like finding policies, configuration profiles, and smart computer groups that are not used by any client could be easier."
"Kandji should give open customization."
Jamf Pro is ranked 1st in Mobile Device Management (MDM) with 105 reviews while Kandji is ranked 4th in Mobile Device Management (MDM) with 1 review. Jamf Pro is rated 9.6, while Kandji is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Jamf Pro writes "Customizable with a self-service portal and a good security posture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kandji writes "An easy-to-manage and deploy solution, but it should provide open customization". Jamf Pro is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl, Microsoft Configuration Manager and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), whereas Kandji is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Open EDR and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
See our list of best Mobile Device Management (MDM) vendors and best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Device Management (MDM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.