We performed a comparison between ISL Online and TeamViewer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is safety."
"The solution has a lot of features. It does what it is made to do and that's all we can ask for, really."
"We like drawing utilities inside ISL. That helps us mark specific regions on the screen, so that end users know what to focus on."
"ISL Online is easy to use. It provides a single platform on which we can do everything, and it's very low maintenance. After installation, you don't need an IT manager or staff to watch over it. It's secure. It's most important for us."
"I personally really appreciate the file transfer feature as it is really easy to use."
"Setting up the solution is easy and there's no maintenance involved."
"The code can be delivered in multiple ways, including an email with a link for an unattended connection."
"We can also monitor our systems at any time from practically anywhere."
"I have been satisfied with TeamViewer overall."
"I like that it helped a lot, even with low bandwidth network connectivity. For example, while I was traveling, sometimes there were requirements for me to join a TeamViewer session and provide technical support. I was able to do that without much of an issue. It is also a secure solution."
"TeamViewer allows us to do multiple controllers on a Host, which is great. We have a lot of Macs in our organization, and TeamViewer being cross-platform is a good thing."
"The implementation process is simple."
"It is easy to use and has a pretty good UI."
"The solution is very stable. We've never had a problem with it."
"The most valuable features of TeamViewer are the ability for administrators to lock the remote systems, simple connections, and easy login access."
"The product is quite stable. The performance is good."
"They need to better advertise the features."
"It would be helpful if they had iSupport for supporting Apple phones."
"We miss the possibility to communicate via head-set in ISL. At the moment, we combine ISL for visual communication with Skype for verbal communication."
"There have been times during updates when something wouldn't work quite right, however, they are quick with updates and quick with fixes."
"There could be a section in the menu describing the new features and changes."
"If there is an update or new feature on ISL Online, I don't know about it. I would be happy to receive a newsletter or notification of new features or updates."
"They should improve the integrations with other incident management software to be able to send the link directly from these platforms."
"I would like to have a little bit more information when new features are released. They have added features that I didn't know about in the past. It would be easier for me to implement new features and consolidate them with other systems in our network if I knew beforehand."
"The file transfer functionality crashes sometimes."
"Considering the earlier versions of the product, I think TeamViewer used to slow down the systems."
"In the next release, I would prefer to have a voice integration and collaboration feature to support multiple teams simultaneously."
"I would like it if the trial version of TeamViewer allowed you to have a connection for much longer."
"The stability of TeamViewer is good, but it could be better."
"TeamViewer has a legacy and may not be using the latest UI trends."
"The solution could be improved by enhancing the use of the mobile version to be used on phones."
"I have noticed that when I access another person's computer, sometimes the tab is visible, and sometimes it is not, which can be difficult."
ISL Online is ranked 16th in Remote Access with 9 reviews while TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews. ISL Online is rated 9.8, while TeamViewer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ISL Online writes "Easy to deploy, stable, scalable and safe". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". ISL Online is most compared with Splashtop Remote Support and ConnectWise ScreenConnect, whereas TeamViewer is most compared with TeamViewer Tensor, Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, BeyondTrust Remote Support and Webex. See our ISL Online vs. TeamViewer report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.