We compared TeamViewer and TeamViewer Tensor based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
TeamViewer is praised for its ease of use and reliable remote access, while suggestions for improvement highlight the need for enhanced performance and interface simplicity. In comparison, TeamViewer Tensor offers efficient remote access and collaboration capabilities, with mixed feedback on pricing and licensing. Users highlight the excellent customer support and significant ROI, but suggest improvements in interface usability and performance.
Features: The valuable features of TeamViewer include ease of use, reliable remote access, seamless screen sharing, efficient file transfer, and exceptional customer support. In comparison, TeamViewer Tensor offers efficient remote access, seamless collaboration, extensive device compatibility, reliable security measures, and excellent customer support.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for TeamViewer is reported to be relatively low, which is seen as a benefit. However, feedback on the setup cost for TeamViewer Tensor is mixed. Some users praised the ease of setup and the lack of significant costs, while others expressed concerns about the licensing process.It may not be straightforward or transparent., TeamViewer's ROI is reported as positive, with users highlighting seamless remote access and cost-effectiveness. TeamViewer Tensor provided a significant ROI, enhancing productivity, reducing travel expenses, and offering robust security measures.
Room for Improvement: TeamViewer has room for improvement in terms of speed, responsiveness, interface simplicity, audio and video quality, customer support, and advanced security features. On the other hand, TeamViewer Tensor needs enhancements in interface usability, performance, user-friendliness, speed, responsiveness, file transfers, and operating system compatibility.
Deployment and customer support: The reviews comparing TeamViewer to TeamViewer Tensor highlight that while some users of TeamViewer spent three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, others only needed a week for both deployment and setup. In contrast, TeamViewer Tensor users mentioned spending multiple months on deployment, along with an additional week for setup., TeamViewer's customer service has received positive remarks for both products. Users praise the helpfulness, promptness, and effectiveness of the assistance provided. The customer service experience is considered reliable and efficient for TeamViewer, while TeamViewer Tensor stands out for its exceptional support levels.
The summary above is based on 39 interviews we conducted recently with TeamViewer and TeamViewer Tensor users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is the ability to remote control a computer system. Overall it is a complete solution."
"This is a unique solution that is very easy to install."
"This solution is straightforward to use."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is the ability to remote into another device."
"We also use it a lot for remote site assistance. We've set up our internal authentication for unattended access to our remote sites. That makes it very easy and convenient to remotely connect with our users and our client machines whenever we need to. It's set as a direct, secure connection. As long as the station has internet access, we can see it and it makes remote support very simple."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is user-friendliness."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer is its ease of use."
"I like that it helped a lot, even with low bandwidth network connectivity. For example, while I was traveling, sometimes there were requirements for me to join a TeamViewer session and provide technical support. I was able to do that without much of an issue. It is also a secure solution."
"Remote desktop sharing is one valuable feature of the solution."
"The most valuable feature of TeamViewer Tensor is the remote access."
"This product is very simple to use and you can connect whether you are behind a firewall or not."
"I am not sure about all the features of TeamViewer, but if they have no voice communication or file transfer features they should add them."
"It's pretty limited on the options they have."
"It would be useful if the solution could facilitate more than one remote user accessing my desktop at a time."
"There is a paid version of this solution with more features available. However, they should provide more free features to the user, such as factor authentication."
"The installation and the update agent could improve."
"The solution could have better scalability."
"Voice communication and screen communication or face-to-face communication could be improved."
"They should release features such as Augmented Reality into both plain and standard versions of TeamViewer."
"The solution could include more AI (Artificial Intelligence)."
"Having the ability to create subgroups and delegate permissions to the group members would be a helpful addition."
"The SSO feature of the solution may sometimes not function perfectly…Pricing might be improved for TeamViewer Tensor."
TeamViewer is ranked 1st in Remote Access with 85 reviews while TeamViewer Tensor is ranked 8th in Remote Access with 4 reviews. TeamViewer is rated 8.6, while TeamViewer Tensor is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of TeamViewer writes "Solid cross-platform remote control, but with kludgy central management and some serious feature issues on macOS". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamViewer Tensor writes "A user-friendly and stable solution providing remote desktop sharing functionality to its users". TeamViewer is most compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, ISL Online, BeyondTrust Remote Support and Webex, whereas TeamViewer Tensor is most compared with TeamViewer Pilot, BeyondTrust Remote Support, Parallels Access, LogMeIn Rescue and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services. See our TeamViewer vs. TeamViewer Tensor report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.