We performed a comparison between Alfresco and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the searching elements of the metadata."
"I like the ease of use, sections, and calendar."
"Document repository."
"The product allows engineering teams and developers to introduce new things in a seamless and easy way."
"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."
"It is quite good."
"Documentum is a highly scalable document management solution because it's built on a solid platform."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"OpenText Documentum's composition is good. It is convenient and straight out of the box."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"I would like them to consider document capture functionality."
"Metadata, auto class, disposition log, and legal hold."
"I think the presentation layer could be improved - currently, it's too complex, and there are too many features cluttered all over the screen."
"Alfresco has a very steep learning curve, and unfortunately, during the learning process, it's very easy to make errors, which often are unforgiving."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"The biggest issue for us is the price of the product."
"OpenText Documentum has a lot of scope for improvement in terms of adding some AI integrations."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
"The user interface can be improved."
Alfresco is ranked 9th in Enterprise Content Management while OpenText Documentum is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Alfresco is rated 8.0, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Alfresco writes "Flexible and customizable but lacking integration with Microsoft". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Alfresco is most compared with SharePoint, Hyland OnBase, IBM FileNet, OpenText Extended ECM and Nuxeo, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and OpenText Content Manager. See our Alfresco vs. OpenText Documentum report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
